Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Item metadata
Title: The first direct ESR dating of a hominin tooth from Atapuerca Gran Dolina TD-6 (Spain) supports the antiquity of Homo antecessor
Authors: Duval, Mathieu
Grün, Rainer
Parés, Josep María
Martín-Francés, Laura
Campaña Lozano, Isidoro
Rosell, Jordi
Shao, Qingfeng
Arsuaga, Juan Luis
Carbonell, Eudald
Bermúdez de Castro, José María
Issue Date: Aug-2018
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Quaternary Geochronology, 2018, 47, 120-137
Abstract: The present study reports the results of the first direct Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) dating study of Homo antecessor, the earliest known hominin species identified in Europe. The analysis of a tooth (ATD6-92) from TD6 unit of Atapuerca Gran Dolina (Spain) following a “semi non-destructive” procedure provides a final age estimate ranging from 624 to 949 ka, which covers all possible uranium uptake scenarios. Last, the additional magnetostratigraphic data collected within TD6 enables to further constrain the initial ESR chronology and to propose an age of between 772 and 949 ka for Homo antecessor, in agreement with previous dating works. Whereas our new results do not refine the existing chronology of stratigraphic unit TD6, they nevertheless support the antiquity of H. antecessor, which pre-dates the estimated divergence age of modern and archaic human lineages based on genetic evidence. This work illustrates the challenges of dating human teeth by means of the ESR method, with the main pitfalls that are sometimes inherent to this specific application (e.g., systematic μCT-scanning of fossil hominin teeth; limited knowledge about the original sedimentary environment for teeth coming from old excavations; heterogeneous spatial distribution or the U-series elements in dental tissues). We identified several sources of uncertainty that may directly impact the accuracy of the age result. In particular, a slight contamination of dentine (<6%) in the enamel fragment measured by ESR was found to induce a significant age underestimation (33%) if not taken into consideration. It indeed caused not only a DE underestimation (by about 8%), but also produced a massive internal dose rate overestimation (by a factor of about 3.5). In contrast, other sources of uncertainty, such as the heterogeneity of the sedimentary environment, the variability of the water content over time, the previous μCT-scanning of the tooth or the potential preferential creation of unstable NOCORs in the ESR signal, showed here a limited impact on the final age result.
ISSN: 1871-1014
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2018.05.001
Type: Article
Appears in Collections:Paleobiología
Geocronología y Geología

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons