Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/2611
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Campos, Cecilia-
dc.contributor.authorMartinón-Torres, María-
dc.contributor.authorModesto-Mata, Mario-
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Francés, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorMartínez de Pinillos, Marina-
dc.contributor.authorBermúdez de Castro, José María-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-30-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-30T14:31:34Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Anthropological Sciences, 2021, 99, 1-18es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1827-4765-
dc.identifier.urihttp://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/2611-
dc.description.abstractOne of the main concerns of paleoanthropologists is to make a correct interpretation of the variability observed in the fossil record. However, the current knowledge about sexual dimorphism in the human lineage comes mainly from the study of modern human, Neanderthal and pre-Neanderthal populations, whereas information available about the intrapopulation variability of the groups that preceded these taxa is still ambiguous. In this preliminary study, Homo antecessor dental sample was assessed with the aim of trying to evaluate the degree of variability of their permanent canines’ dental tissue proportions. Microtomographic techniques were here employed in order to measure and compare the crown volumes and surface areas of their enamel caps and dentine-pulp complexes. Then, the Pearson ́s Coefficient of Variation and the Euclidean Distance were assessed to evaluate of intrapopulation variability of dental sample. The values obtained were also compared with those of the dental samples from Sima de los Huesos site (Spain), the Neanderthal site of Krapina (Croatia), as well as from a broad forensic collection of known sex. Our results showed a marked intrapopulation variability in the dental tissues measurements of the canines of the individuals H1 and H3 from this site. This variability may be interpreted as an indicator of sexual dimorphism. If this is the case, H1 may be considered as a male individual, whereas H3 would be a female. Future discoveries of new fossils in the level TD6.2 of Gran Dolina site might help to confirm or refute this hypothesis.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study has been supported by the Dirección General de Investigación of the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO /FEDER) grant number: PGC2018-093925-B-C31 and The Leakey Foundation through the personal support of G. Getty (2013) and D. Crook (2014-2020) to M. M.-T. C. G-C and L. M-F are the recipients of a post-doctoral research grant at the Atapuerca Foundation.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherIstituto Italiano di Antropologiaes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectH. antecessores_ES
dc.subjectCanineses_ES
dc.subjectDimorphismes_ES
dc.subjectEnameles_ES
dc.subjectDentinees_ES
dc.titleIndicators of sexual dimorphism in Homo antecessor permanent canineses_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.4436/jass.99001-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.4436/jass.99001-
dc.date.available2022-03-30T14:31:34Z-
Appears in Collections:Microscopía y Microtomografía Computarizada
Paleobiología



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons