Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12136/2127
|Title:||Issues of theory and method in the analysis of Paleolithic mortuary behavior: a view from Shanidar Cave|
Hunt, Chris O.
Lahr, Marta Mirazón
Marean, Curtis W.
Miller, Christopher E.
Mustafa, Kaify Ali
Pettitt, Paul B.
Sandgathe, Dennis M.
|Keywords:||Burial;Funerary activity;Mortuary activity;Neanderthal;Sediment micromorphology;Taphonomy|
|Citation:||Evolutionary Anthropology, 2020, 29 (5), 263-279|
|Abstract:||Mortuary behavior (activities concerning dead conspecifics) is one of many traits that were previously widely considered to have been uniquely human, but on which perspectives have changed markedly in recent years. Theoretical approaches to hominin mortuary activity and its evolution have undergone major revision, and advances in diverse archeological and paleoanthropological methods have brought new ways of identifying behaviors such as intentional burial. Despite these advances, debates concerning the nature of hominin mortuary activity, particularly among the Neanderthals, rely heavily on the rereading of old excavations as new finds are relatively rare, limiting the extent to which such debates can benefit from advances in the field. The recent discovery of in situ articulated Neanderthal remains at Shanidar Cave offers a rare opportunity to take full advantage of these methodological and theoretical developments to understand Neanderthal mortuary activity, making a review of these advances relevant and timely.|
|Appears in Collections:||Paleobiología|
Files in This Item:
|Issues of theory and method in the analysis of Paleolithic mortuary behavior a view from Shanidar Cave_Pomeroy_et_al_2020.pdf||5,08 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License