Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/2127
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPomeroy, Emma-
dc.contributor.authorHunt, Chris O.-
dc.contributor.authorReynolds, Tim-
dc.contributor.authorAsouti, Eleni-
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorBosch, Marjolein-
dc.contributor.authorBurke, Ariane M.-
dc.contributor.authorFarr, Lucy ‎-
dc.contributor.authorFoley, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorFrench, Charles-
dc.contributor.authorFrumkin, Amos-
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorHill, Evan-
dc.contributor.authorKabukcu, Ceren-
dc.contributor.authorLahr, Marta Mirazón-
dc.contributor.authorLane, Ross-
dc.contributor.authorMarean, Curtis W. ‎-
dc.contributor.authorMaureille, Bruno-
dc.contributor.authorMutri, Giuseppina-
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Christopher E.-
dc.contributor.authorMustafa, Kaify Ali-
dc.contributor.authorNymark, Andreas-
dc.contributor.authorPettitt, Paul B.-
dc.contributor.authorSala, Nohemi-
dc.contributor.authorSandgathe, Dennis M.-
dc.contributor.authorStringer, Chris-
dc.contributor.authorTilby, Emily-
dc.contributor.authorBarker, Graeme-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-05T16:57:31Z-
dc.date.issued2020-10-
dc.identifier.citationEvolutionary Anthropology, 2020, 29 (5), 263-279es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1060-1538-
dc.identifier.issn1520-6505-
dc.identifier.urihttp://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/2127-
dc.description.abstractMortuary behavior (activities concerning dead conspecifics) is one of many traits that were previously widely considered to have been uniquely human, but on which perspectives have changed markedly in recent years. Theoretical approaches to hominin mortuary activity and its evolution have undergone major revision, and advances in diverse archeological and paleoanthropological methods have brought new ways of identifying behaviors such as intentional burial. Despite these advances, debates concerning the nature of hominin mortuary activity, particularly among the Neanderthals, rely heavily on the rereading of old excavations as new finds are relatively rare, limiting the extent to which such debates can benefit from advances in the field. The recent discovery of in situ articulated Neanderthal remains at Shanidar Cave offers a rare opportunity to take full advantage of these methodological and theoretical developments to understand Neanderthal mortuary activity, making a review of these advances relevant and timely.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipBritish Academy; Calleva Foundation; Human Origins Research Fund; Leverhulme Trust, Grant/Award Numbers: ECF‐2017‐284, RPG‐2013‐105; McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research; Natural Environment Research Council, Grant/Award Numbers: NE/L002507/1, NF/2016/2/14; Rust Family Foundation; Society of Antiquaries of London; Wenner‐Gren Foundation, Grant/Award Number: CONF‐788 .es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherWileyes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 Estados Unidos de América*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectBuriales_ES
dc.subjectFunerary activityes_ES
dc.subjectMortuary activityes_ES
dc.subjectNeanderthales_ES
dc.subjectSediment micromorphologyes_ES
dc.subjectTaphonomyes_ES
dc.titleIssues of theory and method in the analysis of Paleolithic mortuary behavior: a view from Shanidar Cavees_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/evan.21854-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21854es_ES
dc.date.available2020-11-05T16:57:31Z-
Appears in Collections:Paleobiología



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons