Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/1792
Título: Sporadic occupation in Armiña Cave during the Upper Magdalenian: what for?
Autor: Ríos Garaizar, Joseba
San Emeterio Gómez, Aixa
Arriolabengoa, Martín
Aranbarri Erkiaga, Josu
Rofes, Juan
Marín Arroyo, Ana Belén
Rivero, Olivia
Intxaurbe Alberdi, Iñaki
Arranz-Otaegui, Amaia
Salazar Cañarte, Sergio
Medina-Alcaide, María Ángeles
Gárate Maidagán, Diego
Palabras clave: Cave;Archaeological context;Engravings;Magdalenian;Occupation
Fecha de publicación: abr-2020
Editorial: Elsevier
Citación: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2020, 30, 102271
Resumen: The cave of Armiña is the lower level of the same karst cave system as Atxurra Cave, which has a habitat site in the entrance, covering from the Gravettian to the Late Magdalenian periods, and an important Palaeolithic rock art ensemble in the inner part of the cave. The current entrance of Armiña was opened artificially at the end of the 19th century. Between 2016 and 2017 several tests and a 6 m2 excavation were performed in the main hall of Armiña to evaluate its archaeological record. The excavated stratigraphic sequence is sealed by a succession of sterile units (Ia-Ic) with no archaeological or faunal remains. At the bottom of this sterile unit a continuous flowstone separates it from Unit III, an almost sterile unit containing a few transported bones, charcoal fragments and a few lithics found in contact with Unit IV, where the bulk of archaeological remains were found. In Unit IV, a number of bone fragments and lithic tools are associated with a small hearth and an ocher stain. The available archaeological evidence, and the first results of the ongoing multiproxy analyses, suggest that the deposit is the result of a very short occupation event or even shorter visits to this spot inside the cave. These visits were more or less contemporaneous with the occupation levels in Atxurra and probably correspond chronologically to the artistic activity in the deep part of the cave. However, although Armiña Cave is quite suitable for human settlement, only a short-term occupation has been recognized. This could partially be related to the morpho-topographic conditions of the cave which would imply that access from the exterior was difficult at the time of the occupation. Thus, the occupation site might be defined as an Inner Archaeological Context (I.A.C.). Therefore, our main hypothesis is that this short-term occupation was an activity spot for Magdalenian explorers inside the cave, in which the activities they carried out were not exclusively related to technological and subsistence practices, nor to the execution of art, given the particular nature of the finds and the absence of Palaeolithic artistic manifestations in Armiña.
URI: http://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/1792
ISSN: 2352-409X
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102271
Versión del Editor: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102271
Tipo: Article
Aparece en las colecciones: Arqueología
Laboratorio de Geología

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Sporadic occupation in Armiña cave during the Upper Magdalenian What for_Rios-Garaizar_et_al_2020.pdf20.82 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.