Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/599
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorBruner, Emiliano-
dc.contributor.authorFedato, Annapaola-
dc.contributor.authorSilva-Gago, María-
dc.contributor.authorAlonso Alcalde, Rodrigo-
dc.contributor.authorTerradillos Bernal, Marcos-
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Durantes, María Ángeles-
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Guerra, Elena-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-18T13:55:30Z-
dc.date.issued2018-07-
dc.identifier.citationProgress in Brain Research, 2018, 238, 325-345es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0079-6123-
dc.identifier.issn1875-7855-
dc.identifier.urihttp://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/599-
dc.description.abstractBody cognition and lateralization can be investigated in fossils by integrating anatomical and functional aspects. Paleoneurology cannot provide strong evidence in this sense, because hemispheric asymmetries are shared in all extinct human species, and motor cortical areas are difficult to delineate in endocranial casts. However, paleoneurological analyses also suggest that modern humans and Neanderthals underwent an expansion of parietal regions crucial for visuospatial integration and eye–hand–tool management. Because of our technological specialization, haptic cognition can be particularly targeted by evolutionary processes. Hand–tool relationships can be investigated through physical and physiological correlates. In terms of metrics, size is the main factor of hand morphological variation among adult humans, followed by the ratio between thumb length and palmar size. In modern humans, emotional changes during hand–tool contact can be measured by electrodermal activity. During tool manipulation, electrodermal response, which is a physiological correlate of emotional engagement, shows differences between males and females, and it is different for distinct Paleolithic technologies. Emotional engagement, hand management, and haptic cognition are part of a specialized prosthetic technological capacity of modern humans and can provide indirect evidence of cognitive discontinuities in the archeological record.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherElsevier: Monograph Serieses_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.subjectEndocranial asymmetryes_ES
dc.subjectPaleoneurologyes_ES
dc.subjectParietal cortexes_ES
dc.subjectVisuospatial integrationes_ES
dc.subjectHand morphologyes_ES
dc.subjectHaptic cognitiones_ES
dc.subjectElectrodermal activityes_ES
dc.titleCognitive archeology, body cognition, and hand-tool interactiones_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.06.013-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.06.013es_ES
dc.date.available2018-07-18T13:55:30Z-
Aparece en las colecciones: Paleobiología

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Cognitive archeology body cognition and hand–tool interaction_Bruner_et_al_2018.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.2 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir  Solicitar copia


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.