Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/522
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBruner, Emiliano-
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Loeches, Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorBurgaleta Díaz, Miguel-
dc.contributor.authorColom Marañón, Roberto-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-25T15:04:24Z-
dc.date.issued2011-03-
dc.identifier.citationIntelligence, 2011, 39 (2-3), 141-147es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0160-2896-
dc.identifier.urihttp://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/522-
dc.description.abstractBrain shape might influence cognitive performance because of the relationships between functions, spatial organization, and differential volumetric development of cortical areas. Here we analyze the relationships between midsagittal brain shape variation and a set of basic psychological measures. Coordinates in 2D from 102 MRI-scanned young adult human brains were superimposed through a Procrustes approach, and the residual variation was regressed onto 21 cognitive tests performed by the same individuals. Most of the composite and specific variables (including general intelligence, working memory, attention, and executive functions) do not show meaningful correlations with midsagittal brain morphology. However, variables related to mental speed display subtle but consistent correlations with brain shape variation. Such correlations are small, suggesting that the influence of midsagittal brain geometry on individual cognitive performance is negligible. Nevertheless, this evidence can supply information on brain biology and evolution. Areas associated with the parietal cortex appear to be involved in relationships between brain geometry and mental speed. These areas have been associated with relevant endocranial differences between living and extinct humans, and are important as functional and structural components of brain organization. The limited correlation between brain geometry and mental speed among modern individuals might be more relevant when the large paleoneurological variation of the genus Homo is taken into account.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipManuel Martín-Loeches, Miguel Burgaleta and Roberto Colom are funded by grant SEJ-2006-07890 from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Spain (MICINN). Roberto Colom and Miguel Burgaleta are funded by grant PSI2010-20364 from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Spain (MICINN). Manuel Martín-Loeches is also funded by MICINN grant SEJ-2007-60485. Emiliano Bruner is funded by the Program GR. 249, Junta de Castilla y León, Spain, and by the Italian Institute of Anthropology (www.isita-org.com).es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Estados Unidos de América*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectPsychometricses_ES
dc.subjectBrain morphologyes_ES
dc.subjectCognitive processeses_ES
dc.subjectPaleoneurologyes_ES
dc.subjectBrain evolutiones_ES
dc.titleMidsagittal brain shape correlation with intelligence and cognitive performancees_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.intell.2011.02.004-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2011.02.004es_ES
dc.date.available2018-06-25T15:04:24Z-
Appears in Collections:Paleobiología



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons