Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/3586
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSpies, Amy J.-
dc.contributor.authorMcGrath, Kate-
dc.contributor.authorEriksen, Amandine-
dc.contributor.authorMassey, Jason S.-
dc.contributor.authorArlegi, Mikel-
dc.contributor.authorHeuzé, Yann-
dc.contributor.authorBerthaume, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorTocheri, Matthew W.-
dc.contributor.authorGómez-Robles, Aida-
dc.contributor.authorMcFarlin, Shannon C.-
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Tierra Smiley-
dc.contributor.authorGilissen, Emmanuel-
dc.contributor.authorMuvunyi, Richard-
dc.contributor.authorGlowacka, Halszka-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-22T11:40:15Z-
dc.date.issued2026-04-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Biological Anthropology, 189(4)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/3586-
dc.description.abstractObjectives Craniofacial fluctuating asymmetry (FA) in gorillas has been linked to environmental and/or genetic stress. Prolonged population declines increase levels of inbreeding, leading to developmental instability, which can manifest as FA. Among gorillas studied to date, craniofacial FA levels are highest in mountain gorillas (G. beringei beringei) and lowest in western lowland gorillas (G. gorilla gorilla), reflecting known levels of genetic diversity and inbreeding in these subspecies. This study assessed craniofacial FA in Cross River gorillas (G. gorilla diehli), a little-known subspecies with high levels of inbreeding due to a recent genetic bottleneck. Materials and Methods Thirty fixed landmarks of the craniofacial skeleton were used to assess FA in 30 Cross River gorillas using Procrustes ANOVA. Principal component analysis assessed variation in both symmetric and asymmetric components. Differences in FA magnitudes between Cross River gorillas and published data for other Gorilla subspecies were assessed using permutation tests. Results Craniofacial FA accounts for 9.9% of shape variation in Cross River gorillas, whereas directional asymmetry accounts for 0.5%. Allometry accounts for 14.1% of shape variation in the symmetric component and 3.8% in the asymmetric component. Craniofacial FA magnitudes are higher in Cross River gorillas than in western lowland gorillas and lower than in mountain gorillas. Discussion High FA in Cross River gorillas aligns with known levels of inbreeding, supporting the link between genetic stress and craniofacial FA in gorillas. Persistent inbreeding and the loss of genetic diversity may decrease population fitness, further increasing the risk of extinction. Research Highlights Fluctuating asymmetry (FA) accounts for 9.9% of face shape variation in Cross River gorillas. The magnitude of craniofacial FA in Cross River gorillas is higher than in western lowland gorillas and lower than in mountain gorillas. Magnitudes of craniofacial FA align with levels of inbreeding and genetic stress in Cross River gorillas.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherWileyes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_ES
dc.subjectCraniofacial fluctuating asymmetryes_ES
dc.subjectCross River gorillases_ES
dc.subjectGenetic stresses_ES
dc.subjectInbreedinges_ES
dc.titleCraniofacial Fluctuating Asymmetry in Cross River Gorillas (Gorilla gorilla diehli)es_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ajpa.70233-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.70233es_ES
dc.date.available2026-04-22T11:40:15Z-
Appears in Collections:Paleobiología

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Craniofacial Fluctuating Asymmetry in Cross River Gorillas .pdf
  Restricted Access
826.72 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.