Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/324
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBruner, Emiliano-
dc.contributor.authorCuétara, José Manuel de la-
dc.contributor.authorMasters, Michael P.-
dc.contributor.authorAmano, Hideki-
dc.contributor.authorOgihara, Naomichi-
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-17T13:37:26Z-
dc.date.issued2014-04-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Neuroanatomy, 2014, 8: 9es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1662-5129-
dc.identifier.urihttp://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/324-
dc.description.abstractAnatomical systems are organized through a network of structural and functional relationships among their elements. This network of relationships is the result of evolution, it represents the actual target of selection, and it generates the set of rules orienting and constraining the morphogenetic processes. Understanding the relationship among cranial and cerebral components is necessary to investigate the factors that have influenced and characterized our neuroanatomy, and possible drawbacks associated with the evolution of large brains. The study of the spatial relationships between skull and brain in the human genus has direct relevance in cranial surgery. Geometrical modeling can provide functional perspectives in evolution and brain physiology, like in simulations to investigate metabolic heat production and dissipation in the endocranial form. Analysis of the evolutionary constraints between facial and neural blocks can provide new information on visual impairment. The study of brain form variation in fossil humans can supply a different perspective for interpreting the processes behind neurodegeneration and Alzheimer’s disease. Following these examples, it is apparent that paleontology and biomedicine can exchange relevant information and contribute at the same time to the development of robust evolutionary hypotheses on brain evolution, while offering more comprehensive biological perspectives with regard to the interpretation of pathological processes.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis paper is funded by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas “Replacement of Neanderthals by Modern Humans: Testing Evolutionary Models of Learning” from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (#22101006). Emiliano Bruner and José Manuel de la Cuétara are also funded by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain (CGL2012-38434-C03-02) and by the Italian Institute of Anthropology (Isita). José Manuel de la Cuétara is funded by Program “Jovenes Excelentes 2012” (Fundación Gutiérrez Manrique, Spain). Michael Masters is funded by Montana INBRE - National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health, award number 8 P20 GM103474-12. The OASIS project is founded by NIH grants P50 AG05681, P01 AG03991, P20 MH071616, RR14075, RR 16594, BIRN002, the Alzheimer’s Association, the James S. McDonnell Foundation, the Mental Illness and Neuroscience Discovery Institute, and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 3.0 Estados Unidos de América*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectPaleoneurologyes_ES
dc.subjectCranial integrationes_ES
dc.subjectBrain shapees_ES
dc.subjectMyopiaes_ES
dc.subjectAlzheimer’s diseasees_ES
dc.subjectThermoregulationes_ES
dc.subjectMorphometricses_ES
dc.titleFunctional craniology and brain evolution: from paleontology to biomedicinees_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fnana.2014.00019-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2014.00019es_ES
dc.date.available2018-05-17T13:37:26Z-
Appears in Collections:Paleobiología



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons