Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/3040
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFedato, Annapaola-
dc.contributor.authorBruner, Emiliano-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-28T11:17:22Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationCognitive Archaeology, Body Cognition, and the Evolution of Visuospatial Perception, 2023, p. 241-262es_ES
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-323-99193-3-
dc.identifier.urihttps://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/3040-
dc.description.abstractHumans display a specialized “prosthetic capacity” aimed at integrating tools into the body and brain schemes. The evolution of such technological skill was likely associated with changes in the haptic system, in the ability of sensing tools, and in the attentional feedback associated with tool use. Investigating this topic in cognitive archaeology is indeed challenging. Biomechanical models are traditionally employed to study the evolution of the hand, the tool morphology, and the corresponding grasping patterns. Electrodermal analysis can be instead used to investigate the attentional engagement triggered by haptic exploration of Paleolithic stone tools, associated with changes in arousal and other general emotional components. Experimental evidence shows different reactions when handling different tool types, partially influenced by some physical features of the tools. Such psychophysiological correlates may reveal part of the mechanisms involved in the evolution of the human ability to sense and integrate tools in their cognitive system.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipWe are grateful to María Silva-Gago, Marcos Terradillos Bernal, and Rodrigo Alonso Alcalde for their collaboration in the research presented in this review. We thank Jim Hicks for his stimulating comments on arousal and emotions. We thank Rochelle Ackerley and Erin Williams-Hatala for their comments on an early version of this article. The electrodermal analyses were performed thanks to the support of Sociograph and Elena Martín Guerra. This paper is funded by the Spanish Government (PID2021-122355NB-C33) and by the Italian Institute of Anthropology (ISITA).es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_ES
dc.subjectArousales_ES
dc.subjectAttentiones_ES
dc.subjectBody cognitiones_ES
dc.subjectCognitive archaeologyes_ES
dc.subjectElectrodermal analysises_ES
dc.subjectEmbodimentes_ES
dc.subjectLower paleolithices_ES
dc.subjectStone toolses_ES
dc.titleHandling prehistory: tools, electrophysiology, and hapticses_ES
dc.typeBook chapteres_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/B978-0-323-99193-3.00012-X-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99193-3.00012-Xes_ES
dc.date.available2023-08-28T11:17:22Z-
Appears in Collections:Paleobiología

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Chapter 11 - Handling prehistory Tools, electrophysiology, and haptics_Fedato & Bruner_2023.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.72 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.