Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/2910
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorPineda, Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorCourtenay, Lloyd A.-
dc.contributor.authorTéllez, Edgar-
dc.contributor.authorYravedra, José-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T07:37:43Z-
dc.date.issued2023-04-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 2023, 48, 103850es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2352-409X-
dc.identifier.issn2352-4103-
dc.identifier.urihttps://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/2910-
dc.description.abstractGeometric Morphometrics (GMMs) is a useful tool for the experimental characterization of different taphonomic modifications on bone surfaces, including anthropogenic cut marks. Until now, most research has been conducted evaluating experimental and non-altered cut marks, in order to obtain a better control of the studied variables. However, in archaeological contexts, bones are frequently subject to different taphonomic alterations and, in most cases, bone surfaces and the associated taphonomic signals show different grades of alteration. In this study, we present an experimental approach in which experimental cut marks were produced, mechanically altered, digitized, and analyzed using GMMs, in order to provide an in-depth characterization of how overlying taphonomic traces can alter cut marks. In the experiment, 40 cut marks were subjected to abrasion by a mixture of distilled water, sands, and gravels, using a tumbling machine in a series of cumulative cycles for a total of 4 h: cycle 1 (0.5′), cycle 2 (0.5′), cycle 3 (1 h) and cycle 4 (2 h). Cut mark cross-section profiles were then obtained using 3D digital microscopy, and a 2D 7-landmark designed for cut mark analyses were employed. Our results show a clear statistical differentiation among non-altered cut marks belonging to Cycle 0, and altered cut marks. The depth and opening angle of cut marks appear to be the features with a higher weight in the differentiation between altered and non-altered cut marks. On the other hand, there are no distinctions when differentiating between the diverse altered cycles. These results, like those previously obtained in an experimental approach using a binocular microscope, point to the limitation of the identification of cut marks and other taphonomic signals in archaeological contexts with altered bone surfaces, caused by the fast alteration and the loss of diagnostic criteria of the bone surface modifications.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipWe would like to thank the support of the TIDOP research group, in particular Diego González-Aguilera, as well as Julia Aramendi for her suggestions and comments on earlier versions of this paper. Antonio Pineda is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (FJC2019-040804-I, Subprograma Juan de la Cierva-Formación). Lloyd A. Courtenay is supported by Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, with an FPI Predoctoral Grant (Ref. PRE2019-089411). Edgar Téllez is supported by DEATHREVOL project that has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Grant agreement No. 949330). Financial support was provided by the AGAUR agency, funded project 2017 SGR-1040. The Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social (IPHES-CERCA) has received financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the “María de Maeztu” program for Units of Excellence (CEX2019-000945-M).es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectExperimental Archaeologyes_ES
dc.subjectGMMses_ES
dc.subjectHydric abrasiones_ES
dc.subjectTaphonomyes_ES
dc.subjectTumblinges_ES
dc.titleAn experimental approach to the analysis of altered cut marks in archaeological contexts from Geometrics Morphometricses_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jasrep.2023.103850-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2023.103850es_ES
dc.date.available2023-03-15T07:37:43Z-
Aparece en las colecciones: Paleobiología



Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons