Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/2860
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBruner, Emiliano-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-19T14:46:36Z-
dc.date.issued2022-12-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Anthropological Sciences, 2022, 100, 173-192es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1827-4765-
dc.identifier.urihttps://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/2860-
dc.description.abstractThe relationship between anthropology and neuroscience has always been friendly but controversial, because they embrace inclusive common topics (human beings and their brains) although following distinct approaches, often more holistic and speculative in the former field, more reductionist and quantitative in the latter. In recent decades, novel disciplines have been proposed to bridge the gap between anthropology and neuroscience, mostly taking into account their common interest in human evolution. Paleoneurology deals with the study of brain anatomy in extinct species. Neuroarchaeology concerns the study of brain functions associated with behaviours that are of interest according to the archaeological record. Cognitive archaeology investigates the evolution of those behaviours following methods and theories in psychology. These new fields can provide quantitative and experimental support to topics that, to date, have been largely discussed only on a theoretical basis. Nonetheless, working with extinct species necessarily involves many limitations. Consistent theories on the evolution of our cognitive abilities must rely on the integration of different sources of information, on parallel and independent evidence from different fields, and on a proper attitude: openness and caution.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipI am grateful to my past supervisors, who have been supporting my career ever since the beginning, namely Massimo Cresta, Giorgio Manzi, and José María Bermudez de Castro, and to the friends, students, and colleagues who have been exploring these fields with me during these twenty years, including Sofia Pereira-Pedro, Annapaola Fedato, María Silva-Gago, Ralph Holloway, Fred Coolidge, Naomichi Ogihara, Roberto Colom, and many others. This article was funded by the Italian Institute of Anthropology, and by the Spanish Government (Project PID2021-122355NB-C33 financed by MCIN/ AEI/10.13039/501100011033/FEDER, UE). A special acknowledgment goes to Giovanni Destro-Bisol, for all these years of cultural (and psychological) resistance: may the present always be with you, my friend!es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherIstituto Italiano di Antropologiaes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectPaleoneurologyes_ES
dc.subjectNeuroarchaeologyes_ES
dc.subjectCognitive Archaeologyes_ES
dc.subjectHuman Evolutiones_ES
dc.subjectBrain Evolutiones_ES
dc.subjectCognitiones_ES
dc.titlePrehistory, neuroscience, and evolutionary anthropology: a personal journeyes_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.4436/JASS.10011-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.4436/JASS.10011es_ES
dc.date.available2022-12-19T14:46:36Z-
Appears in Collections:Paleobiología

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Prehistory, neuroscience, and evolutionary anthropology a personal journey_Bruner_2022.pdf1.65 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons