Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/2705
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSilva-Gago, María-
dc.contributor.authorFedato, Annapaola-
dc.contributor.authorTerradillos-Bernal, Marcos-
dc.contributor.authorAlonso Alcalde, Rodrigo-
dc.contributor.authorHodgson, Timothy-
dc.contributor.authorBruner, Emiliano-
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-01T12:44:38Z-
dc.date.issued2022-06-
dc.identifier.citationArchaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2022, 14(6), 114es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1866-9565-
dc.identifier.urihttp://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/2705-
dc.description.abstractThe role of experience during the exploration of lithic artefacts can be been investigated through multiple approaches. Knowledge can influence visual perception of the environment, whilst action “affordances” can be processed at the first sight of an object. In this study, we used eye tracking to analyse whether and to what extent archaeological knowledge can influence visuospatial attention whilst interacting with stone tools. Archaeologists were found to pay more visual attention to the middle region and the knapped surface. Differences between the visual exploration of choppers and handaxes were also found. Although the general pattern of distribution of the visual attention was similar to naïve subjects, participants with archaeological experience paid more attention to functionally relevant regions. Individuals with archaeological experience directed more attention to the upper region and the knapped surface of the tools, whilst naïve participants spent more time viewing the middle region. We conclude that although both groups could direct their attention to action relevant features in stone tools, functional affordances had a greater effect in subjects with previous experience. Affordances related to manipulation triggered lower attention and showed no differences between participants.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipWe are extremely grateful to all the volunteers who participated in this survey and to two anonymous reviewers to their helpful comments. This study is supported by the Junta de Castilla y León and co-financed by the European Social Funds (EDU/574/2018), by MCIN/AEI/ of the Spanish Government co-financed by ERDF Funds (Atapuerca Project: PGC2018-093925-B-C31/32) and by the Italian Institute of Anthropology (ISITA).es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectEye-trackinges_ES
dc.subjectAffordanceses_ES
dc.subjectCognitive archaeologyes_ES
dc.subjectLithic technologyes_ES
dc.subjectVisual explorationes_ES
dc.titleDoes knowledge influence visual attention? A comparative analysis between archaeologists and naïve subjects during the exploration of Lower Palaeolithic toolses_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12520-022-01574-7-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-022-01574-7es_ES
dc.date.available2022-07-01T12:44:38Z-
Appears in Collections:Paleobiología



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons