Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/2655
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSilva-Gago, María-
dc.contributor.authorIoannidou, Flora-
dc.contributor.authorFedato, Annapaola-
dc.contributor.authorHodgson, Timothy-
dc.contributor.authorBruner, Emiliano-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-18T13:24:24Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01-
dc.identifier.citationPerception, 2022, 51(1), 3-24es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0301-0066-
dc.identifier.issn1468-4233-
dc.identifier.urihttp://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/2655-
dc.description.abstractThe study of lithic technology can provide information on human cultural evolution. This article aims to analyse visual behaviour associated with the exploration of ancient stone artefacts and how this relates to perceptual mechanisms in humans. In Experiment 1, we used eye tracking to record patterns of eye fixations while participants viewed images of stone tools, including examples of worked pebbles and handaxes. The results showed that the focus of gaze was directed more towards the upper regions of worked pebbles and on the basal areas for handaxes. Knapped surfaces also attracted more fixation than natural cortex for both tool types. Fixation distribution was different to that predicted by models that calculate visual salience. Experiment 2 was an online study using a mouse-click attention tracking technique and included images of unworked pebbles and ‘mixed’ images combining the handaxe's outline with the pebble's unworked texture. The pattern of clicks corresponded to that revealed using eye tracking and there were differences between tools and other images. Overall, the findings suggest that visual exploration is directed towards functional aspects of tools. Studies of visual attention and exploration can supply useful information to inform understanding of human cognitive evolution and tool use.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by the Junta de Castilla y León and co-financed by European Social Funds (EDU/574/2018), and by the Spanish Government (Atapuerca Project; PGC2018-093925-B-C31). MSG was also funded by the University of Burgos, Spain.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationses_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_ES
dc.subjectSaccadeses_ES
dc.subjectSaliency mapses_ES
dc.subjectArchaeologyes_ES
dc.subjectVisiones_ES
dc.subjectAction affordanceses_ES
dc.titleVisual Attention and Cognitive Archaeology: An Eye-Tracking Study of Palaeolithic Stone Toolses_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/03010066211069504-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1177/03010066211069504es_ES
dc.date.available2022-05-18T13:24:24Z-
Appears in Collections:Paleobiología



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.