Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/255
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBruner, Emiliano-
dc.contributor.authorAmano, Hideki-
dc.contributor.authorCuétara, José Manuel de la-
dc.contributor.authorOgihara, Naomichi-
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-25T15:14:37Z-
dc.date.issued2015-09-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Anatomy, 2015, 227 (3), 268-276es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0021-8782-
dc.identifier.issn1469-7580-
dc.identifier.urihttp://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/255-
dc.description.abstractThe spatial relationships between brain and braincase represent a major topic in surgery and evolutionary neuroanatomy. In paleoneurology, neurocranial landmarks are often used as references for brain areas. In this study, we analyze the variation and covariation of midsagittal brain and skull coordinates in a sample of adult modern humans in order to demonstrate spatial associations between hard and soft tissues. The correlation between parietal lobe size and parietal bone size is very low, and there is a marked individual variation. The distances between lobes and bones are partially influenced by the dimensions of the parietal lobes. The main pattern of morphological variability among individuals, associated with the size of the precuneus, apparently does not influence the position of the neurocranial sutures. Therefore, variations in precuneal size modify the distance between the paracentral lobule and bregma, and between the parietal lobe and lambda. Hence, the relative position of the cranial and cerebral landmarks can change as a function of the parietal dimensions. The slight correlation and covariation among these elements suggests a limited degree of spatial integration between soft and hard tissues. Therefore, although the brain influences the cranial size and shape during morphogenesis, the specific position of the cerebral components is sensitive to multiple effects and local factors, without a strict correspondence with the bone landmarks. This absence of correspondent change between brain and skull boundaries suggests caution when making inferences about the brain areas from the position of the cranial sutures. The fact that spatial relationships between cranial and brain areas may vary according to brain proportions must be considered in paleoneurology, when brain anatomy is inferred from cranial evidence.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study is funded by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas ‘Replacement of Neanderthals by Modern Humans: Testing Evolutionary Models of Learning’ from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (#22101006). Emiliano Bruner and Jose Manuel de la Cuetara are funded by the Ministerio de Economıa y Competitividad, Spain (CGL2012-38434-C03-02) and by the Italian Institute of Anthropology (Isita). The OASIS project is founded by NIH grants P50AG05681, P01AG03991, P20MH071616, RR14075, RR16594, BIRN002, the Alzheimer’s Association, the James S. McDonnell Foundation, the Mental Illness and Neuroscience Discovery Institute, and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherWileyes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.subjectGeometric morphometricses_ES
dc.subjectNeuroanatomyes_ES
dc.subjectPaleoneurologyes_ES
dc.subjectParietal lobeses_ES
dc.subjectPrecuneuses_ES
dc.subjectVaultes_ES
dc.titleThe brain and the braincase: a spatial analysis on the midsagittal profile in adult humanses_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12355es_ES
dc.date.available2018-04-25T15:14:37Z-
Appears in Collections:Paleobiología

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The brain and the braincase a spatial analysis on the midsagittal profile in adult humans_Bruner_et_al_2015.pdf
  Restricted Access
538.13 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.