Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/235
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZorrilla-Revilla, Guillermo-
dc.contributor.authorMateos Cachorro, Ana-
dc.contributor.authorPrado-Nóvoa, Olalla-
dc.contributor.authorVidal-Cordasco, Marco-
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, Jesús-
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-18T14:18:20Z-
dc.date.issued2017-08-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2017, 20 (8), 771-776es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1440-2440-
dc.identifier.issn1878-1861-
dc.identifier.urihttp://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/235-
dc.description.abstractObjectives The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity of the SenseWear Armband™ (SWA, Model MF-SW, BodyMedia Inc.) as a tool to assess daily brief, light- to moderate-intensity activities. Design A total of 41 volunteers were recruited (27 males, 14 females) to perform several trials, including a resting metabolic rate test and a number of walking trials while carrying different loads in a backpack. Methods Energy expenditure during trials was measured using both the SWA™ mini device, with the indirect calorimetry method (MasterScreen CPX and Oxycon Mobile JAEGER™ devices) used for validated comparative measurement. Results The SWA™ mini shows agreement with indirect calorimetry in all trials. However, the SWA™ mini over-estimated expenditure in all participants. Individual assessment estimates with the SWA™ mini also exhibited random errors. The variations in energy expenditure (EE) resulting from increased carried loads during the trials were not statistically significant when EE was measured with the SWA™ mini. Furthermore, Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) calculation, highly dependent on estimated energy expenditure per unit time, also was likely overestimated. In contrast, the SWA™ mini provided estimates of the resting metabolic rate with a small error. Conclusions The SWA™ mini is not a valid device for estimating energy expenditure in brief light- or moderate activities.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe experimental design (Ref. CEIC 1497) was performed at the CENIEH facility Bioenergy Laboratory (Burgos, Spain). This research was funded by the National Research Centre on Human Evolution (CENIEH, Spain).es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Estados Unidos de América*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectEnergy expenditurees_ES
dc.subjectSenseWear Armband™ minies_ES
dc.subjectAccelerometryes_ES
dc.subjectPhysical activityes_ES
dc.subjectIndirect calorimetryes_ES
dc.subjectResting metabolic ratees_ES
dc.titleCarrying loads: validating a portable tri-axial accelerometer during frequent and brief physical activityes_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jsams.2017.01.236-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.01.236es_ES
dc.date.available2019-08-15-
Appears in Collections:Bioenergía y Análisis del Movimiento
Paleobiología

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Carrying loads_Zorrilla-Revilla_et_al_J_Sci_Med_Sport_2017.pdf986.25 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons