Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12136/2106
Item metadata
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTorres-Tamayo, Nicole-
dc.contributor.authorMartelli, Sandra-
dc.contributor.authorSchlager, Stefan-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Martínez, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorSanchis-Gimeno, Juan Alberto-
dc.contributor.authorMata‐Escolano, Federico-
dc.contributor.authorNalla, Shahed-
dc.contributor.authorOgihara, Naomichi-
dc.contributor.authorOishi, Motoharu-
dc.contributor.authorBastir, Markus-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-19T16:57:18Z-
dc.date.issued2020-11-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2020, 173 (3), 514-534es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0002-9483-
dc.identifier.issn1096-8644-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12136/2106-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Understanding thoraco‐pelvic integration in Homo sapiens and their closest living relatives (genus Pan) is of great importance within the context of human body shape evolution. However, studies assessing thoraco‐pelvic covariation across Hominoidea species are scarce, although recent research would suggest shared covariation patterns in humans and chimpanzees but also species‐specific features, with sexual dimorphism and allometry influencing thoraco‐pelvic covariation in these taxa differently. Material and Methods: N = 30 adult H. sapiens and N = 10 adult Pan troglodytes torso 3D models were analyzed using 3D geometric morphometrics and linear measurements. Effects of sexual dimorphism and allometry on thoraco‐pelvic covariation were assessed via regression analyses, and patterns of thoraco‐pelvic covariation in humans and chimpanzees were computed via Two‐Block Partial Least Squares analyses. Results: Results confirm the existence of common aspects of thoraco‐pelvic covariation in humans and chimpanzees, and also species‐specific covariation in H. sapiens that is strongly influenced by sexual dimorphism and allometry. Species‐specific covariation patterns in chimpanzees could not be confirmed because of the small sample size, but metrics point to a correspondence between the most caudal ribs and iliac crest morphology that would be irrespective of sex. Conclusions This study suggests that humans and chimpanzees share common aspects of thoraco‐pelvic covariation but might differ in others. In humans, torso integration is strongly influenced by sexual dimorphism and allometry, whilst in chimpanzees it may not be. This study also highlights the importance not only of torso widths but also of torso depths when describing patterns of thoraco‐pelvic covariation in primates. Larger samples are necessary to support these interpretations.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad: Grant Number: CGL‐2015‐63648‐P.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherWileyes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesses_ES
dc.subjectChimpanzeees_ES
dc.subjectHominoideaes_ES
dc.subjectIntegrationes_ES
dc.subjectPLSes_ES
dc.subjectTorsoes_ES
dc.titleAssessing thoraco‐pelvic covariation in Homo sapiens and Pan troglodytes: a 3D geometric morphometric approaches_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ajpa.24103-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24103es_ES
dc.date.available2020-10-19T16:57:18Z-
Appears in Collections:Paleobiología



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.