Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12136/1921
Item metadata
Title: Hand morphometrics, electrodermal activity, and stone tools haptic perception
Authors: Fedato, Annapaola
Silva-Gago, María
Terradillos Bernal, Marcos
Alonso Alcalde, Rodrigo
Martín-Guerra, Elena
Bruner, Emiliano
Issue Date: Jun-2020
Publisher: Wiley
Citation: American Journal of Human Biology, 2020, 32 (3), e23370
Abstract: Objectives: Tool use requires integration among sensorial, biomechanical, and cognitive factors. Taking into account the importance of tool use in human evolution, changes associated with the genus Homo are to be expected in all these three aspects. Haptics is based on both tactile and proprioceptive feedbacks, and it is associated with emotional reactions. Previous analyses have suggested a difference between males and females, and during haptic exploration of different typologies of stone tools. Here, we analyze the correlation between electrodermal reactions during stone tool handling and hand morphology to provide evidence of possible allometric factors shared by males and females. Methods: Electrodermal analysis was used to investigate some specific parameters involved in these reactions, such as changes in the level of attention and arousal. We analyzed the responses of 46 right‐handed adults to 20 distinct stone tools while blindfolded. Results: Females have smaller hands and a wider range of electrodermal reactions. Within males and females, hand diameters and general hand size do not correlate with the degree of electrodermal level and response. Conclusions: Sex differences in electrodemal reaction during stone tool handling are apparently not due to the effect of hand size or proportions. Differences between males and females are better interpreted as real sex differences, either due to a biological or cultural influences. Hand size does not influence the degree of arousal or attention during tool exploration, suggesting that other factors trigger individual reactions. These results add to a general cognitive approach on hand‐tool evolution and tool sensing.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12136/1921
ISSN: 1042-0533
1520-6300
DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.23370
Editor version: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23370
Type: Article
Appears in Collections:Paleobiología



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.