Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/480
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDomínguez-Villar, David-
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Andy-
dc.contributor.authorFairchild, Ian J.-
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, Richard Lawrence-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-19T15:19:17Z-
dc.date.issued2012-12-
dc.identifier.citationQuaternary Geochronology, 2012, 14, 57-66es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1871-1014-
dc.identifier.issn1878-0350-
dc.identifier.urihttp://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/480-
dc.description.abstractStalagmites occasionally present laminae which, when demonstrated to be annual, may be used to construct an annually resolved chronology. Such annually laminated records provide an opportunity to improve the precision of age models based on other dating techniques. Since annually laminated stalagmites sometimes present a complex stratigraphy with lateral variations in lamina thickness associated with changing macroscopic growth shapes, a procedure for lamina counting is developed here, which complements other methods of speleothem lamina counting. Regardless of the complexity of laminae, when the exact date of a laminated section is unknown, lamina counting provides a floating chronology. This paper describes a method to anchor floating chronologies in speleothems using the least-squares fit of the lamina counting to the radiometric dates (typically U–Th). The estimation of uncertainties in the age model is also considered, which accounts for uncertainties in the lamina counting as well as the fit of the lamina count to the radiometric dates. The uncertainty of this fit does not depend on the analytical uncertainty of the radiometric dates or the precision in the lamina counting, and simply considers all the available dates and their distance to the proposed age model. As an example, the method was applied to a stalagmite from Northern Spain and its accuracy was compared with the annually resolved and cross-dated Greenland chronology during the 8.2 ka event. Although this method has been described for stalagmites, it could be applied to other records in which cross-dating techniques would not be suitable.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community under a Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship of the Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013 (grant agreement n° 219891). Additionally, the financial support for the study of LV5 stalagmite was provided by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN) with the projects REN2001-1409CLI and CGL2004-1866/BTE.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Estados Unidos de América*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectFloating chronologyes_ES
dc.subjectAnnual laminaees_ES
dc.subjectU-Thes_ES
dc.subjectStalagmitees_ES
dc.subjectSpaines_ES
dc.titleA method to anchor floating chronologies in annually laminated speleothems with U–Th dateses_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.quageo.2012.04.019-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2012.04.019es_ES
dc.date.available2018-06-19T15:19:17Z-
Appears in Collections:Geocronología y Geología



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons