Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/478
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorDomínguez-Rodrigo, Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorBunn, Henry T.-
dc.contributor.authorPickering, Travis Rayne-
dc.contributor.authorMabulla, Audax Z. P.-
dc.contributor.authorMusiba, Charles-
dc.contributor.authorBaquedano, Enrique-
dc.contributor.authorAshley, Gail Mowry-
dc.contributor.authorDíez Martín, Fernando-
dc.contributor.authorSantonja, Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorUribelarrea del Val, David-
dc.contributor.authorBarba Egido, Rebeca-
dc.contributor.authorYravedra Saínz de los Terreros, José-
dc.contributor.authorBarboni, Doris-
dc.contributor.authorArriaza, María del Carmen-
dc.contributor.authorGidna, Agness Onna-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-19T14:47:36Z-
dc.date.issued2012-07-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Archaeological Science, 2012, 39 (7), 2116-2127es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0305-4403-
dc.identifier.issn1095-9238-
dc.identifier.urihttp://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/478-
dc.description.abstractRecent excavations at FLK North (Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania) have produced new information on the orientation of archaeological materials at various levels of the site. This information includes the uniform distribution of material azimuths, which contrasts with previous inferences of highly patterned orientations of materials in the Bed I archaeological sites. Those previous inferences of patterned material orientations are based on Mary Leakey's 50-year-old drawings of artifact and fossil bone distribution, but are not verified by our precise measurements of archaeological objects made in situ. Nor do those previous results agree with the general lack of geological, geomorphological, and/or taphonomic data that would indicate significant post-depositional movement of archaeological materials in the sites. We argue here that Leakey's drawings are incomplete (only portions of each assemblage were drawn) and inaccurate in their representation of the original locations, shapes and orientations of most archaeological specimens. This argument is supported by several important mismatches in object representations between a photograph taken of a small portion of the FLK 22 Zinjanthropus site floor before the removal of the archaeological items, and the sketch of the same area drawn by Leakey. Thus, we conclude that primary orientation data of excavations (i.e., direct measurements taken from items) generated prior to object removal are the only valid indicators of the relative isotropy or anisotropy of these important paleoanthropological assemblages.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipWe appreciate major funding provided by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the European project I + D HAR2010-18952-C02-01 and the Spanish Ministry of Culture through the Heritage Institute and the program of funding for archaeological projects abroad. We also thank the Comunidad de Madrid for funding provided through the I + D project S2010/BMD-2330. Support was also provided by the Fundación Conjunto Paleontológico de Teruel.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Estados Unidos de América*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectOlduvai Gorgees_ES
dc.subjectFLK Northes_ES
dc.subjectFLK Zinjes_ES
dc.subjectOrientationes_ES
dc.subjectIsotropyes_ES
dc.subjectAutochthonyes_ES
dc.subjectSite formation historyes_ES
dc.subjectTaphonomyes_ES
dc.titleAutochthony and orientation patterns in Olduvai Bed I: a re-examination of the status of post-depositional biasing of archaeological assemblages from FLK North (FLKN)es_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jas.2012.02.027-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.02.027es_ES
dc.date.available2018-06-19T14:47:36Z-
Aparece en las colecciones: Arqueología



Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons Creative Commons