The female Homo pelvis from Gona: response to Ruff (2010)

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/384

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Simpson, Scott W.	-
dc.contributor.author	Quade, Jay	-
dc.contributor.author	Levin, Naomi E.	-
dc.contributor.author	Semaw, Sileshi	-
dc.date.accessioned	2018-05-30T14:15:32Z	-
dc.date.issued	2014-03	-
dc.identifier.citation	Journal of Human Evolution, 2014, 68, 32-35	es_ES
dc.identifier.issn	0047-2484	-
dc.identifier.issn	1095-8606	-
dc.identifier.uri	http://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/384	-
dc.description.abstract	Ruff (2010a, b) challenged the taxonomic attribution of the Gona fossil pelvis (BSN49/P27 (Simpson et al., 2008)) to Homo erectus based on the premise that its acetabulum is too small and outside the range of currently known early Homo. Ruff’s alternative taxonomic suggestion is that the pelvis may belong to another species, notably Australopithecus (Paranthropus) boisei. We reject these proposals for the reasons outlined below.	es_ES
dc.language.iso	en	es_ES
dc.publisher	Elsevier	es_ES
dc.rights	Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Estados Unidos de América	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/	*
dc.title	The female Homo pelvis from Gona: response to Ruff (2010)	es_ES
dc.type	Article	es_ES
dc.identifier.doi	10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.12.004	-
dc.relation.publisherversion	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.12.004	es_ES
dc.date.available	2018-05-30T14:15:32Z	-
Appears in Collections:	Arqueología