Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/3508
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStout, Dietrich-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Cheng-
dc.contributor.authorMuller, Antoine-
dc.contributor.authorRogers, Michael J.-
dc.contributor.authorSemaw, Sileshi-
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-11T12:04:56Z-
dc.date.issued2025-08-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 32(4)es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/3508-
dc.description.abstractThe appearance of “large cutting tools” in the early Acheulean is widely regarded as the first evidence for the imposition of intended forms on artifacts, with major implications for hominin cognitive and cultural capacities. However, the nature and extent of explicit design documented by these forms remains open to debate. To address this issue, we analyzed the complete collection of early Acheulean (ca. 1.7–1.2 Ma) flaked pieces from four sites (BSN17, DAN5, OGS12, and OGS5) in the Gona Project Area and compared these with all of the flaked pieces from two published Oldowan (> 2.5 Ma) sites at Gona. By comparing shape variation to measures of flaking intensity and coverage, we sought to identify technological patterns indicative of intent. Current results provide little evidence for the presence of discrete tool types or imposed morphological norms in our sample. We do, however, observe systematic patterns of raw material selection and core surface modification aimed at the production and maintenance of useful cutting edges on relatively large supports (cobbles and large flake blanks). This is consistent with prior characterizations of Acheulean tool form as arising from functional and ergonomic design imperatives for large hand-held cutting tools. Although the generalizability of these results to other sites remains to be seen, we propose that distinctive early Acheulean artifact forms may have arisen as secondary accommodations to the primary goal of increasing tool size to meet the novel demands (e.g., extended use-life, enhanced transportability, utility for heavy-duty cutting) of a more general shift in hominin behavioral ecology at this time. Our results provide support for the presence of Acheulean design at Gona, not necessarily in the sense of shared morphological norms, but certainly in the broader sense of deliberate technological choices made in view of behavioral goals and material constraints.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipContinuous major awards and grants were made by the Leakey Foundation. Additional funding was provided by the EU Marie Curie (FP7-PEOPLE-2011-CIG) and the Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universities, Spain, through MINECO (“GONAH” (HAR2013-41351-P)), PALEOAFRICA (PGC2018-095489-B-I00), and the ACHEULOAFRICA (HAR2013-41351-P) projects. The NSF (SBR-9910974 and RHOI BCS-0321893 to T. White and F.C. Howell), the Wenner-Gren Foundation, and the National Geographic Society provided funding for earlier parts of the Gona research. We are grateful for the support of the John and Lois Rogers Trust.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherSpringer Naturees_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesses_ES
dc.subjectLithic technologyes_ES
dc.subjectEarly Stone Agees_ES
dc.subjectHandaxees_ES
dc.subjectLarge cutting tooles_ES
dc.subjectPickes_ES
dc.subjectShapinges_ES
dc.titleImposed Form in the Early Acheulean? Evidence from Gona, Afar, Ethiopiaes_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10816-025-09730-8-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-025-09730-8es_ES
dc.date.available2025-09-11T12:04:56Z-
Appears in Collections:Arqueología

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Imposed Form in the Early Acheulean Evidence from Gona, Afar, Ethiopia.pdf
  Restricted Access
2.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.