Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/3164
Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Silva-Gago, María | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Fedato, Annapaola | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Terradillos-Bernal, Marcos | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Bruner, Emiliano | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-09T14:05:43Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 29th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Archaeologists, 2023, p. 1106 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-80-88441-05-2 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/3164 | - |
| dc.description | Ponencia presentada en: 29th Virtual Annual Meeting of the European Association of Archaeologists, Belfast, Ireland, 30 agosto-2 septiembre de 2023 | es_ES |
| dc.description.abstract | Vision is the dominant source of sensory information in humans. It channels the relationships between the individual and the environment, including tools. Due to the fact that we receive a huge amount of information from our surroundings, it is essential to selectively focus the attention on some stimuli instead of others. The patterns of visual attention can be studied through eye-tracking technology, which consists of measuring eye position and movements. Taking into account the relevance of visual perception in the human genus, this technology can provide a useful approach to understand visual behaviour from an evolutionary perspective. In this sense, we developed a series of experimental studies involving different stone tool technologies and different scanning conditions. Our results showed that each lithic technology triggers a different visual strategy, which suggests that there are distinct attentional patterns involved in the interaction with these tools. Although tools have been interpreted as the output of the cognitive system, different disciplines have adopted an embodied cognition perspective, arguing that physical tools should be considered as a functional part of the cognitive network. Following this approach, archaeological remains would be an active element of cognition, and not mere products of the brain. Likewise, different sets of artefacts would represent different cognitive elements, which are susceptible to experimental studies | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | en | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | European Association of Archaeologists | es_ES |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
| dc.title | Perception and stone tools. An approach to past visual behaviour through lithic technology. | es_ES |
| dc.type | Presentation | es_ES |
| dc.type | Other | es_ES |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.e-a-a.org/eaa2023 | es_ES |
| dc.date.available | 2024-02-09T14:05:43Z | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Congresos, encuentros científicos y estancias de investigación | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perception and stone tools. An approach to past visual behaviour through lithic technology_Silva-Gago et al_2023.pdf | 30.33 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.








