Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/2950
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez, Francisco Javier-
dc.contributor.authorDeirnik, Hosein-
dc.contributor.authorZarei, Mehdi-
dc.contributor.authorMedialdea, Alicia-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-04T13:10:30Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01-
dc.identifier.citationGeomorphology, 2023, 421, 108527es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0169-555X-
dc.identifier.issn0094-8659-
dc.identifier.urihttps://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/2950-
dc.description.abstractThis work documents for the first time the prehistoric, but morphologically pristine, Emad Deh rock avalanche of the Zagros Mountains. The ca. 420 Mm3 rock avalanche was initiated as a rockslide on a dip slope affecting a weak unit of marls with interbedded limestones overlain by a thick and competent limestone formation. The slope is located on the northern limb of the growing Gavbast Anticline and at the edge of the inflating Gavbast Dome, related to a buried salt diapir of Hormuz salt. The unconfined rock avalanche deposits, covering 32 km2, were accumulated on coalescing alluvial fans and a floodplain environment. The depositional lobe shows sectors with distinctive morphological features attributable to the variable flow-depositional behavior of the debris stream, controlled by the nature of the substrate: (1) proximal continuous breccia flanked by levees; (2) intermediate depression; and (3) flat-topped polygonal hills and conical hills. A morphometric and spatial distribution analysis has been performed with the 550 conical hills (hummocks) mapped in the distal sector. The rock avalanche, with 914 m of maximal height drop (H) and 9280 m of runout (L), displays an extraordinarily high mobility (H/L index of 0.09), that can be attributed to the combined effect of dynamic rock fragmentation and basal lubrication by the soft substrate in the floodplain. Relief rejuvenation and slope over-steepening related to the growth of the anticline and the inflation of the Gavbast Dome are considered the main long-term preparatory factors that shifted the slope to a state of marginal stability. The slope failure was likely triggered by a large M ≥ 6.5–7 earthquake at ca. 5.4 ka, as indicated by OSL ages obtained from folded alluvium situated just beneath the rock avalanche deposit. The source of the earthquake was probably a blind reverse fault situated beneath the asymmetric Gavbast Anticline, as support the structural and geomorphic features of the fold. The identification and dating of large coseismic landslides in the Zagros Mountains, where large earthquakes are rarely accompanied by primary surface ruptures, could help to improve both landslide and seismic hazard assessments.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors are very grateful to the major of Gavbast village, Mohammad Chubaki for providing logistic support, and to Tomas Panek and Michele Delchiaro for their insightful reviews. Edwin Nissen and Ezgi Karasözen kindly provided data from their relocated earthquake catalog of the Fars Arc. The work by FG was supported by a Salvador de Madariaga grant (PR19/00028) and projects (CGL2017-85045-P, DIAPERNO: PID2021-123189NB-I00) of the Spanish Government (Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación). The TanDEM-X digital elevation models were provided by the German Aerospace Center (grant DEM_GEOL288).es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherElsevier & International Geosynthetics Society (IGS)es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectEarthquake-induced landslidees_ES
dc.subjectLong-runout landslidees_ES
dc.subjectHummockes_ES
dc.subjectGrowing foldes_ES
dc.subjectActive diapires_ES
dc.subjectFlexural-slip faultinges_ES
dc.titleGeology, geomorphology and geochronology of the coseismic? Emad Deh rock avalanche associated with a growing anticline and a rising salt diapir, Zagros Mountains, Iranes_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.geomorph.2022.108527-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2022.108527es_ES
dc.date.available2023-05-04T13:10:30Z-
Appears in Collections:Geocronología y Geología



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons