Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/1672
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVettese, Delphine-
dc.contributor.authorBlasco, Ruth-
dc.contributor.authorCáceres, Isabel-
dc.contributor.authorGaudzinski-Windheuser, Sabine-
dc.contributor.authorMoncel, Marie-Hélène-
dc.contributor.authorThun Hohenstein, Ursula-
dc.contributor.authorDaujeard, Camille-
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-29T14:54:00Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-
dc.identifier.citationArchaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2020, 12 (48)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1866-9557-
dc.identifier.issn1866-9565-
dc.identifier.urihttp://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/1672-
dc.description.abstractPercussion marks have been studied in the field of archaeology for more than a century. Researchers have identified, characterized and analysed them in order to distinguish them from traces of environment modification to bone and reconstruct hominin subsistence strategies. The multiplicity of studies based on percussion marks in different languages has led to a proliferation of different terminologies used for the same marks, especially in English. In addition, as a result of numerous experimental studies or ethnological observations, it is possible to accurately identify the different steps of the butchery process and each of the related marks. We know from experimental studies that the morphology of percussion traces inflicted by the same tools can differ as their morphology depends on many factors (i.e. location and intensity of blows, intrinsic bone variables). In addition to this, carnivore and hominin traces can be superimposed, which sometimes renders their interpretation difficult. Renewed interest in these percussion marks owing to the emergence of new technical means highlighted the need to review their classification and clarify the nomenclature. With this in mind, we reviewed the abundant scientific literature to propose a refined and descriptive nomenclature. The aim is to provide a coherent terminology for the description and analysis of impact fractures in different European languages. We also propose classifying percussion marks into three categories: (1) percussion marks sensu stricto, (2) traces consecutive to bone breakage and (3) striation marks related to marrow extraction.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project was supported by the Fondation Nestlé France (SJ 671–16) (https://fondation.nestle.fr/); the Centre d’Information des Viandes – Viande, sciences et société (SJ 334–17); and the Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle. R. Blasco develops her work within the Spanish MINECO/FEDER projects CGL2015–68604-P, and the Generalitat de Catalunya-AGAUR projects CLT009/18/00055 and 2017 SGR 836. I. Cáceres received financial support of the Spain Government (project n° PGC2018–093925-B-C32 (MICINN-Feder) and the 2017 SGR1040 (AGAUR) and the 2018PFR-URV-B2–91 (URV) projects. Research at IPHES is framed in the CERCA program.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesses_ES
dc.subjectPercussion markses_ES
dc.subjectTerminologyes_ES
dc.subjectZooarchaeologyes_ES
dc.subjectTaphonomyes_ES
dc.subjectLong bone breakagees_ES
dc.titleTowards an understanding of hominin marrow extraction strategies: a proposal for a percussion mark terminologyes_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12520-019-00972-8-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-019-00972-8es_ES
dc.date.available2020-01-29T14:54:00Z-
Appears in Collections:Arqueología



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.