Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/151
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSantonja, Manuel-
dc.contributor.authorRubio Jara, Susana-
dc.contributor.authorPanera Gallego, Joaquín-
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Romero, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorTarriño Vinagre, Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorPérez-González, Alfredo-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-19T15:39:24Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-
dc.identifier.citationQuaternary International, 2018, 480, 95-117es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1040-6182-
dc.identifier.urihttp://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/151-
dc.description.abstractAmbrona is located in a karst landscape, and occupies a key geographic position, a transit area with natural routes connecting the three main drainage basins in the interior of the Iberian Peninsula. The site dates from the middle of MIS 11 and consists of fluvial-lacustrine deposits. Investigation of Ambrona, traditionally linked to that of Torralba (both sites are in the province of Soria, in Spain), has played a significant role in increasing our knowledge of the Acheulean in Europe, especially in the debate on hunting versus scavenging. Over the course of a century, more than 3400 m2 have been excavated at Ambrona by four teams, led respectively by the Marquis of Cerralbo (1914–1916), C. Howell (1961–1963), C. Howell and L.G. Freeman (1980–1983), and M. Santonja and A. Pérez-González (1993–2000). In this paper we present, in their stratigraphic context, the results of our technological analysis of complete lithic series found during the excavations of the Lower Stratigraphic Member at Ambrona carried out from 1993 to 2000. During this period we excavated 685 m2. Only in Level AS3 was a large part of the lithic industry found in primary position, whereas the assemblages in the other levels had been greatly influenced by sedimentary processes. The whole lithic assemblage comprises 728 items. We shall analyze the chaînes opératoires evidenced in each of the five identified levels, according to the raw materials used. Tools made on flake include very specialized types, but retouching is usually not intense; tool-maintenance processes are barely documented. The knapping methods used were mainly discoidal, bifacial and multipolar. Except for a few local limestone items, the knapped stones found at Ambrona (quartz, quartzite and limestone) were brought to the site, sometimes from dozens of kilometers away. The study of this collection confirms its attribution to the Acheulean techno-complex, with its characteristic handaxes and cleavers.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research was conducted in the framework of the Junta de Castilla y León's CEN186A12 projects.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Estados Unidos de América-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/-
dc.subjectAcheuleanes_ES
dc.subjectMiddle Pleistocenees_ES
dc.subjectLithic technologyes_ES
dc.subjectIberian Peninsulaes_ES
dc.subjectAmbrona sitees_ES
dc.titleAmbrona revisited: the acheulean lithic industry in the lower stratigraphic complexes_ES
dc.typeArticlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.quaint.2017.01.021-
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.01.021es_ES
dc.date.available2020-06-30-
Appears in Collections:Arqueología
Geocronología y Geología



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons