Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/1450
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorBruner, Emiliano-
dc.contributor.authorGrimaud-Hervé, Dominique-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Xiujie-
dc.contributor.authorHolloway, Ralph L.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-12T14:43:05Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationXVII World UISPP Congress, 2014, p. 928es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://cir.cenieh.es/handle/20.500.12136/1450-
dc.descriptionPonencia presentada en: XVII World UISPP Congress, 1-7 de septiembre 2014, Burgoses_ES
dc.description.abstractThere is still no agreement on the taxonomic and phylogenetic affinity between African, Chinese, and Indonesian specimens generally referred to as Homo erectus sensu lato. Apart from minor differences in brain size, no endocranial differences have consistently been described among these three groups. This study is aimed at evaluating differences in the endocranial proportions among these three geographical samples. We compute a multivariate survey on a set of traditional metric variables commonly used in paleoneurology, to evaluate the degree and pattern of endocranial variation in the whole group. Principal component analysis and cluster analysis have been computed on arcs and diameters, to quantify possible differences and shared patterns of variability. The three groups largely overlap in terms of morphological variation. The Indonesian sample displays a larger variation in terms of size, but more homogeneous proportions in terms of overall shape. However, group-specific differences cannot be tested statistically because of the small sample size. General morphometric affinity between specimens seems not influenced by geography. Independently upon the taxonomic and phylogenetic status of these three groups, the endocranial proportions cannot reveal patent differences in the overall brain form, at least taking into account the current available sample and the traditional endocranial diameters and curves. It remains to be evaluated whether or not discrete characters or shape analysis can reveal more localized or subtle differences between these three geographic groups.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherInternational Union for Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences (IUPPS)es_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.titlePaleoneurology of Homo erectus: endocranial variation and proportions in african and asian sampleses_ES
dc.typePresentationes_ES
dc.typeOtheres_ES
dc.date.available2019-09-12T14:43:05Z-
Aparece en las colecciones: Congresos, encuentros científicos y estancias de investigación



Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.